Why Toppling Tyranny Requires More Than Non-Violence

“Even the Vatican City have a security guard, Swiss Soldiers late alone Oromia, the richest and ancient Nation of Africa encircled by Vultures in the Horn of Africa”

Why Toppling Tyranny Requires More Than Non-Violence

The proposition that non-violent resistance can ignite self-stemming – a movement towards individual and collective empowerment – within individuals and groups facing oppression is undoubtedly appealing. It speaks to the inherent human desire for freedom and the potential for even the most disenfranchised to reclaim their agency.

However, a hard look at history reveals a stark truth: while non-violent struggle can be a powerful catalyst, it has rarely, if ever, been sufficient to dismantle a truly entrenched tyranny. The core of the issue lies in the very definition of a tyrant: someone who maintains power through force and repression.

A tyrant’s reign isn’t built on charisma or popular support, but rather on the unwavering control of weaponry and the machinery of oppression. Guns, tanks, prisons, surveillance infrastructure – these are the tools that solidify their authority and silence dissent. Suggesting that non-violent pleas alone can penetrate this armored fortress is,at best, optimistic and, at worst, dangerously naive.

The 2018 revolution of the Qeerroos and Qaarees of the Great Oromo nation was a watershed moment, characterized by its profound commitment to nonviolence. For decades, the Oromo people had endured the oppressive rule of the TPLF-EPRDF, a regime that equated governance with the exclusive use of force and suppression.

The youth-led movement, embodied by the Qeerroos and Qaarees, consciously rejected this legacy of violence, opting instead for mass peaceful protests, civil disobedience, and unwavering demands for self-determination and fundamental rights. Their sacrifice, demonstrated through immense courage and resilience in the face of brutal crackdowns, was a testament to the power of nonviolent resistance.

However, this transformative movement, born out of aspirations for genuine change, found itself navigating a treacherous path. The residuals of the toppled TPLF-EPRDF fascist regime, accustomed to a paradigm where only the gun dictated outcomes, proved adept at undermining the nascent peace.

These elements, deeply invested in the old order and its methods, perceived the nonviolent revolution not as a genuine desire for a more inclusive and just society, but as a temporary disruption to be overcome through familiar, authoritarian tactics.

Their actions and manipulations sought to derail the promise of peaceful conflict resolution, instead attempting to reintroduce the very cycles of violence and repression that the Qeerroos and Qaarrees had so bravely sought to dismantle.

From Tigray People’s Liberation Front to Naked Dictator

The Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), once hailed as a liberator from the Derg regime, turned from Liberator of Tigray to Naked fascist dictator under the mantra of The foundation of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia was laid in 1994 with the ratification of its constitution.

As the preamble stated, “The Nations, Nationalities and Peoples of Ethiopia have, through their elected Representatives, ratified the Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia.”

This suggested a commitment to a multi-ethnic federation where power was distributed amongst the various groups within the country. Some argue, however, that this was merely a facade, a carefully crafted “camouflage” to disguise the TPLF’s true agenda. The assertion is that the TPLF, though operating under the banner of the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF), effectively controlled the coalition and thus, the entire government.

This control, according to critics, allowed them to consolidate their power, marginalize other ethnic groups, and enrich themselves at the expense of the broader population. They point to issues of corruption, human rights abuses, and the suppression of political dissent as evidence of this “naked fascist dictator” dynamic.

Allegations of widespread human rights abuses, systematic discrimination, and brutal suppression have fueled long-standing resentment and continue to shape the political landscape.

One of the most prominent accusations centers around the mass incarceration of Oromos. Reports proved that prisons overflowed with individuals from all walks of life, targeted simply for their ethnicity or perceived opposition to the regime. Schools, typically symbols of learning and opportunity, were allegedly repurposed as makeshift detention centers, further illustrating the scale and scope of the alleged crackdown.

Beyond imprisonment, the TPLF regime is accused of employing violent tactics to silence dissent and maintain control. Accounts detail the targeting and assassination of Oromos, creating an atmosphere of fear and intimidation. The regime’s security forces, particularly the “Agazi” unit, are often compared to the Nazi SS-troops, accused of employing excessive force and brutality against unarmed civilians, especially during peaceful demonstrations.

The alleged massacres of non-violent protestors became a chilling hallmark of the TPLF’s rule, fueling widespread outrage and contributing to the narrative of a brutal and oppressive regime. Economic marginalization is another key grievance.

Allegations of land grabbing and forced evictions intensified during the TPLF’s reign, disproportionately impacting Oromo communities who rely heavily on agriculture for their livelihoods. These policies allegedly aimed to benefit TPLF-affiliated businesses and individuals, further exacerbating existing inequalities and fueling resentment towards the ruling elite.

Where does the War Criminal, Abiy Ahmed , Global Pariah leads?

In October 2019, the world celebrated Abiy Ahmed, the Prime Minister of Ethiopia, awarding him the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to broker a historic peace agreement with neighboring Eritrea, ending a two-decade-long stalemate.

The Nobel Committee lauded his “decisive initiative to resolve the border conflict with neighboring Eritrea” and his commitment to fostering reconciliation and democratic reforms within Ethiopia. The award was met with widespread optimism, painting a picture of a new era of stability and progress in the Horn of Africa. A dead born Child.

However, less than a year later, that optimism lay shattered. In November 2020, Abiy Ahmed launched a military offensive in the Tigray region of Ethiopia, plunging the country into a brutal and protracted conflict that has left a stain on his legacy and raised serious questions about the Nobel Committee’s judgment.

The Tigray War, as it became known, stemmed from a complex web of political tensions between the ruling “Prosperity Party” a misnomer, invented in wish to forget that Abiy Ahmed, an Ox how was a Claf of the TPLFs-OPDO under the mantra of EPRDF.whose right place could have been in the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague if “This World is not this World”. When Justice Stalls and Tyrants Reign.

How can it be that individuals accused of heinous acts – war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide – often evade the long arm of international justice, leaving victims scarred and the delicate framework of global law teetering on the brink? When we live in a world ostensibly governed by laws, treaties, and a shared understanding of human rights.

A world where the and as a beacon of hope, promising accountability for the gravest of crimes. Yet, a stark reality persists, a dissonance that leaves us questioning whether this world is truly the world we were promised. Tyranny on the saddle of political power maintain it by premise of necropolitics and justice denied for victims of atrocities.

It is crucial to acknowledge that these are serious allegations, and a comprehensive and impartial investigation is necessary to fully understand the extent and nature of these alleged abuses. The wounds of the past continue to fester, addressing these historical grievances with transparency and accountability therer can be no long lasting peace in the Horn of Africa .

Crimes Committed Since TPLF’s to “Prosperity Party”

Naked dictatorial rule and Human right abuses:

• Suppression of Opposition:

Systematically silenced dissenting voices, through intimidation, imprisonment, assassination, indiscriminate killing. waging wars of indiscriminate killing and terrorizing the downtrodden masses by scapegoating them as the supporter or sympathizers of folk liberation fonts such the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA).

• Opposition Parities:

The proliferation of opposition party lists in Abyssinia serves as a thin veneer of democracy, a propagandistic tool wielded by the tyrannical regime to project an image of political pluralism. However, these parties are often nominal entities, existing only on paper, devoid of genuine power or influence.

Confined within the suffocating constraints imposed by the regime, they lack the resources, infrastructure, and freedom to operate effectively. In essence, these supposed opposition groups find themselves trapped in a metaphorical prison, unable to establish offices, implement their platforms, or meaningfully challenge the ruling powers.

The Abyssinian government’s intolerance of dissent and robust opposition ensures that these parties remain perpetually marginalized, existing solely to bolster the regime’s false claims of democratic governance. were allegedly hampered in their ability to organize and campaign effectively.

• Economic Domination:

The pursuit of political power in the Abyssinian empire, historically, has been marred by allegations of resource misappropriation and self-enrichment. Critics contend that those in positions of authority have often exploited their power to amass wealth, diverting resources away from the general population and into the hands of themselves and a close circle of loyal associates.

This system, some argue, operates in a manner akin to a mafia, where personal gain and the enrichment of affiliates take precedence over the needs of the wider population. The consequences of such alleged corruption are dire, with many citizens facing poverty, food insecurity, and chronic malnutrition while those in power accumulate vast fortunes.

• Ethnic Favoritism :

The virtual “Abyssinia ” which the European colonizers contorted from the term Habesha i.e nominal “Amhara and Tigre.” They set up a template as a mirror image of Berlin in Africa at the Berlin conferences o f1884-1885 in Scramble for Africa was for these Three outlaw illiterate megalomaniac Shiftas (brigands) village bullies, such as Kasa of Gonder (later Tewodros II), Kasa of Tigre (later Yohannis IV), and Sahle Mariam (later Menelik II).

These were a wondering predatory hordes who lived intents preying upon local citizens that one can not allocate a turf to them except the village were they were born. Thus to cartography a mile of turf even the province where the were born late alone “state” can only possible on piece of paper that suits , the wish and whims of the bandits and virtual dream, other wise it is not possible to realize on the soil and to claim at this junction history of the northern region’s i.e. called “Tigray and Amhara.

The three local Shiftas arose in the rgion at this junction history become the favored and candidates of choices that suited their wishes and whims of European monarchical colonial powers of the participants of the Berlin Conferences to serving as a buffer zone and proxy for European powers in the strategically vital geopolitical region bordering the Red Sea and the Nile River.

By proving all means necessary European enabled these arrogant, illiterate and fanatic outlaw killer Shifta individuals to invade, commit genocides, evictions, occupy and prey upon the Terra their feet held and the people that fall at their hand, the rich south. The myth of “Habesha or Amhara elitism was born from vacuum and that hold to very date.The contemporary assimilate, globally reckoned blasted liar, pariah and cold blooded killer and a thieve named Abiy Ahmed, with out a slight shame built status from grave yard. for series of genociders and preach to them is a tangible evidence .

The assimilate hybrid mind dreams to follow their foot steps and to be crowned as “The King of Kings.” As his masters he also considered the entire South as is property and Oromia being the core of the Empire that carry at least over 60 % of the the burdens of the predatory empire sine her birth in all instances socioeconomically and political power reflecting the ongoing trajectory of the DPSCAE to death.

One can not rewind time and history two to four centuries back unless one is schizophrenic mental stage and lead to the death of the empire for ever. As a result freedom, peace, security shall born out of it.

Tyrants operate within a starkly limited vocabulary; their language is the gun, the symbol of absolute power and enforced obedience. Concepts like peace, democracy, and justice are viewed as dangerous subversion, a suicidal cyanide pill that threatens the very foundation of their rule.

To expect a tyrant to willingly embrace these ideals is to misunderstand the nature of tyranny itself – they will cling to power until their last breath. History demonstrates that armed struggle, the fight for self-determination, is often the only recourse against the entrenched, unwavering oppression of tyrannical regimes. It’s a grim reality, but one born from the understanding that force is often the only language a tyrant truly understands and fears.

• Conclusion

Tyrants operate within a starkly limited vocabulary; their language is the gun, the symbol of absolute power and enforced obedience. Concepts like peace, democracy, and justice are viewed as dangerous subversion, a suicidal cyanide pill that threatens the very foundation of their rule. To expect a tyrant to willingly embrace these ideals is to misunderstand the nature of tyranny itself – they will cling to power until their last breath.

Armed struggle has often been seen as the only viable option for fighting against entrenched tyranny and achieving liberation. This is because tyrants and oppressive regimes typically only understand the language of force and violence.

They are often unwilling to engage in peaceful negotiations or to cede power willingly, even in the face of popular opposition and demands for change. In such situations, the use of arms and armed struggle may become necessary to force the tyrant to relinquish power and allow for the establishment of a more just and democratic society.Throughout history, there have been many examples of successful armed struggles against tyranny.

These struggles have often been long and difficult, and have required great sacrifices from those involved. But in the end, they have often been successful in achieving their goals of liberation and self-determination.

Despite these risks, however, there are situations in which armed struggle may be the only viable option for fighting against tyranny and achieving liberation. In such cases, it may be necessary to use force in order to defend oneself and one’s community, and to force the tyrant to relinquish power. This may involve the use of arms, either individually or collectively, in order to resist oppression and assert the right to self-determination.

Armed struggle is the only option that has en left to justice, democracy, and self-determination. All other avenues for peaceful resolution have been exhausted The Oromo people’s struggle for self-determination and justice has been as old as the creation of one of the most backward Dependent Predatory Settler Colonial Abyssinia Empire (DPSCAE) in many forms hence forth. that armed struggle should always be seen as a last resort.

History demonstrates that armed struggle, the fight for self-determination, is often the only recourse against the entrenched, unwavering oppression of tyrannical regimes. It’s a grim reality, but one born from the understanding that force is often the only language a tyrant truly understands and fears.